ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Conventional one-handed compared to two-handed endoscopic ear surgery using an endoscope holder: a single center study.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Minimally Invasive, Maximum Views.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOne-handedness is a challenge in conventional endoscopic ear surgery (EES). We present results on the first-ever application of the passive endoscope holder 'Endofix exo' (Co. AKTORmed GmbH, Neutraubling, Germany) in EES, which enables two-handed surgery.
methodsThis two-sided study compares cut-suture time, operating time, postoperative complications, graft take rates, hearing results and quality of life in patients who underwent first stage tympanoplasty due to tympanic membrane perforation with intact ossicular chain conditions. 25 patients received classic EES (EES-, mean age: 28 ± 21 years) and 15 received EES with the passive holder (EES+, mean age: 48 ± 21 years).
resultsMean operating times (EES-: 96 ± 38 (SD) min; EES+: 107 ± 33 min), cut-suture times (EES-: 68 ± 30 min; EES+: 73 ± 31 min), complications, graft take rates and hearing results (preoperative air bone gap (ABG) (PTA4): 15 dB ± SD 8 dB (EES-); 16 dB ± SD 8 dB (EES+); postoperative ABG (PTA4): 11.25dB ± SD 11.3dB (EES-); 14 dB ± SD 10 dB (EES+)) did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Postoperative hearing results and quality of life tended to improve in both groups (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: The passive endoscope holder has been successfully applied during the course of the study. However, modifications of the endoscope holder and further studies are recommended focusing on positioning of grafts and prostheses to obtain conclusive results regarding the superiority of two-handed EES over one-handed conventional EES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.