ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2024
Moving on from clinical animal-derived surfactants to peptide-based synthetic pulmonary surfactant.
Review in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surfactant therapy in neonatal care: advances, challenges, and practical considerations.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Surfactant protein SP-B: one ring to rule the molecular and biophysical mechanisms of the pulmonary surfactant system.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on lung surfactant has exerted a great impact on newborn respiratory care and significantly improved survival and outcome of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) due to surfactant deficiency because of lung immaturity. Current clinical, animal-derived, surfactants are among the most widely tested compounds in neonatology. However, limited availability, high production costs, and ethical concerns about using animal-derived products constitute important limitations in their universal application. Synthetic lung surfactant offers a promising alternative to animal-derived surfactants by providing improved consistency, quality and purity, availability and scalability, ease of production and lower costs, acceptance, and safety for the treatment of neonatal RDS and other lung conditions. Third-generation synthetic surfactants built around surfactant protein B (SP-B) and C (SP-C) peptide mimics stand at the forefront of innovation in neonatal pulmonary medicine, while nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has become the standard noninvasive respiratory support for preterm infants. nCPAP can prevent the risk of chronic lung disease (bronchopulmonary dysplasia) and reduce lung injury by avoiding intubation and mechanical ventilation, is a relatively simple technique, and can be initiated safely and effectively in the delivery room. Combining nCPAP with noninvasive, preferably aerosol, delivery of synthetic lung surfactant promises to improve respiratory outcomes for preterm infants, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.