ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Coronary artery calcium measurement on attenuation correction computed tomography using artificial intelligence: correlation with coronary flow capacity and prognosis.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostication and clinical opportunities with AI for coronary artery calcium: a scoping review.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Beyond Traditional Risk Calculators: The Expanding Role of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Preventive Cardiology.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to test whether the coronary artery calcium (CAC) burden on attenuation correction computed tomography (CTac), measured using artificial intelligence (AI-CACac), correlates with coronary flow capacity (CFC) and prognosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent [
resultsIn total, 289 patients were included in this study. Significant negative correlations were found between AI-CACac and stress MBF (ρ = -0.363, p < 0.001) and MFR (ρ = -0.305, p < 0.001). AI-CACac > 10 was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of impaired CFC (31% vs. 7%, p < 0.001) and significant ischaemia (20% vs. 7%), which remained significant after adjusting for other risk factors. MACE occurred in 49 (17%) patients (median follow-up, 284 days), and those who experienced MACE had significantly higher AI-CACac (median, 166 vs. 56; p = 0.039). However, multivariable analysis revealed an independent prognostic association among impaired CFC, diabetes, smoking, but not for AI-CACac.
conclusionAI-measured CACac correlates well with PET-measured MBF and CFC, but its prognostic significance requires further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.