ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Radiology of bronchiectasis].
Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchiectasis is an irreversible bronchial dilatation. It is chronically progressive through a vicious circle of secretion retention, infection, inflammation and structural damage. The underlying causes are diverse and the severity of the disease is variable, which makes both the diagnostics and treatment challenging. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard in the diagnosis of bronchiectasis and can be helpful in clarifying the etiology. The type of bronchiectasis, the distribution of the bronchiectasis within the lungs and associated findings are particularly relevant. Imaging is also important in monitoring the progression of bronchiectasis. In the usual report of the findings this is carried out visually and descriptively, while semiquantitative scores and computer-aided quantitative analysis of the respiratory tract enable a more precise assessment and are used in particular for clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39404768What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.