ArticleJournal of animal science2024
The essential oil blend Agolin Ruminant L reduces methane production in vitro and in vivo when included in the drinking water of cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of an Essential Oil Blend on In Vitro Methane Production, In Vitro and In Vivo Nutrient Digestibility, Growth Performance, and Meat Quality in Lithuanian Blackface Lambs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Use of Essential Oils in the Diet of Lactating Cows Enhances Productivity and Reduces Methane in Free-Grazing Commercial Dairy Farms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to determine the potential for the essential oil blend Agolin Ruminant L (Agolin) to reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions from beef cattle when delivered via drinking water. Experiment 1 evaluated aqueous solutions of Agolin (50 mg/L) and a nonprotein nitrogen and mineral solution (uPRO ORANGE [uPRO]; 1.7 mL/L) individually and in combination, where Agolin was added to concentrated uPRO at 3%, 4.5%, and 6% Agolin (w/w) prior to dilution with water at 1.7 mL/L, for a total of 5 treatments. These were incubated for 48 h with a medium-quality Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) hay substrate, with gas production, CH4 concentration in gas, and digestibility measured in vitro. In experiment 2, Droughtmaster steers (n = 24) were fed a basal diet of Rhodes grass hay and were allocated to 1 of 3 water treatments (n = 8 per treatment) supplemented with either uPRO (2.27 mL uPRO/L water), or 1 of 2 inclusion rates of Agolin in combination with uPRO (2.27 mL uPRO and 6 µL Agolin/L water or 2.27 mL uPRO and 24 µL Agolin/L water) with enteric CH4 emissions, feed and water intake, and live-weight gain (LWG) measured over 56 d. In experiment 1, the inclusion of Agolin in uPRO at 6% (w/w) resulted in a reduction in CH4 production (15.8%; P = 0.003) and the proportion of CH4 in the gas produced (24.5%; P < 0.001). In experiment 2, steers consuming the lower quantity of Agolin via drinking water had a 16.4% (P = 0.0027) reduction in CH4 production over the experiment, declining from 140 g/d during week 1 to 117 g/d in week 8. This inclusion rate of Agolin in the drinking water also resulted in a 25 g (17.6%) CH4/d decrease in emissions by steers compared to control steers (P = 0.0205). However, no significant differences in CH4 yield (g CH4/kg dry matter intake), or CH4 intensity (g CH4/kg LWG) by steers were observed between treatments. These results demonstrated that Agolin reduces CH4 emissions when mixed in an aqueous solution under in vitro and in vivo conditions, providing a potential method to reduce enteric CH4 emissions from cattle in extensive production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.