Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39404694›Full record

ArticleChildhood (Copenhagen, Denmark)2024

Applying co-production principles in research: reflections from young people and academics.

Alice MacLachlan, Praveena Pemmasani, Isla Jamieson-Mackenzie, Christina McMellon, Emily Cunningham, Ruth Lewis, E Kay M Tisdall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice MacLachlanMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow.
Praveena PemmasaniTRIUMPH Network Youth Advisory Group member.
Isla Jamieson-MackenzieTRIUMPH Network Youth Advisory Group member.
Christina McMellonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow.
Emily CunninghamMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow.
Ruth LewisMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow.
E Kay M TisdallChildhood & Youth Studies, MHSES University of Edinburgh.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-production, a form of collaborative working, is guided by principles including valuing all participants, building on individual strengths, blurring distinctions between roles, delivering benefits for all participants, building support networks and supporting people to deliver work themselves. This article explores how co-production is understood by young people and researchers and how co-production principles can be applied within a research context. We identify challenges of implementing existing co-production frameworks in research and key areas to consider for future work.

Indexed as

collaborationCo-productionreflective practiceresearchyoung people

Identifiers

PMID39404694
PMCPMC7616617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.