Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39404682›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference)2019

An Optimized E-nose for Efficient Volatile Sensing and Discrimination.

Gonçalo Santos, Cláudia Alves, Ana Carolina Pádua, Susana Palma, Hugo Gamboa, Ana Cecília Roque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fish Gelatin-based Films for Gas Sensing.Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gonçalo SantosUCIBIO, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Cláudia AlvesUCIBIO, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Ana Carolina PáduaUCIBIO, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Susana PalmaUCIBIO, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Hugo GamboaLaboratório de Instrumentação Engenharia Biomédica e Física da Radiação (LIBPhys-UNL), Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Monte da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Ana Cecília RoqueUCIBIO, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic noses (E-noses), are usually composed by an array of sensors with different selectivities towards classes of VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds). These devices have been applied to a variety of fields, including environmental protection, public safety, food and beverage industries, cosmetics, and clinical diagnostics. This work demonstrates that it is possible to classify eleven VOCs from different chemical classes using a single gas sensing biomaterial that changes its optical properties in the presence of VOCs. To accomplish this, an in-house built E-nose, tailor-made for the novel class of gas sensing biomaterials, was improved and combined with powerful machine learning techniques. The device comprises a delivery system, a detection system and a data acquisition and control system. It was designed to be stable, miniaturized and easy-to-handle. The data collected was pre-processed and features and curve fitting parameters were extracted from the original response. A recursive feature selection method was applied to select the best features, and then a Support Vector Machine classifier was implemented to distinguish the eleven distinct VOCs. The results show that the followed methodology allowed the classification of all the VOCs tested with 94.6% (± 0.9%) accuracy.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsElectronic NoseMachine LearningVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID39404682
PMCPMC7616581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.