Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39404679›Full record

ArticleSimplifying medical ultrasound : 4th International Workshop, ASMUS 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. ASMUS (Workshop) (4th : 2023 : Vancouver, B.C. ; Online)2023

Echo from noise: synthetic ultrasound image generation using diffusion models for real image segmentation.

David Stojanovski, Uxio Hermida, Pablo Lamata, Arian Beqiri, Alberto Gomez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Simplifying medical ultrasound : 4th International Workshop, ASMUS 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. ASMUS (Workshop) (4th : 2023 : Vancouver, B.C. ; Online), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David StojanovskiKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, SE1 7EU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7912-5249
Uxio HermidaKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, SE1 7EU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-3489
Pablo LamataKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, SE1 7EU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-4928
Arian BeqiriKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, SE1 7EU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-1788
Alberto GomezKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, SE1 7EU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-7589

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a novel pipeline for the generation of synthetic ultrasound images via Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) guided by cardiac semantic label maps. We show that these synthetic images can serve as a viable substitute for real data in the training of deep-learning models for ultrasound image analysis tasks such as cardiac segmentation. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, we generated synthetic 2D echocardiograms and trained a neural network for segmenting the left ventricle and left atrium. The performance of the network trained on exclusively synthetic images was evaluated on an unseen dataset of real images and yielded mean Dice scores of 88.6

Indexed as

Diffusion ModelsImage synthesisUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39404679
PMCPMC7616613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.