ArticleClinical and translational science2024
A "one-step" approach to heart rate correction and statistical analysis applied to conscious dog QTc studies.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A "one-step" approach to heart rate correction and statistical analysis applied to conscious dog QTc studies.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A "one-step" method which combined the heart rate correction and statistical analysis for conscious nonhuman primate (NHP) QTc assessment was recently published. The principles of this method are applicable to other species. In the current analysis, we demonstrate the utility of the technique in conscious dog QTc studies. Two studies in male dogs (n = 8 and n = 7) implanted with telemetry devices were used. In both studies, treatments were randomized and all animals received all treatments. In the primary study, the effect on QTc of moxifloxacin was compared with vehicle. Each treatment (vehicle and moxifloxacin) was given on two separate occasions. In the second study, dogs were given vehicle or dofetilide. Conventional QTc analysis was compared with the "one-step" method. The effect on QTc relative to vehicle was determined along with the median minimal detectable difference. As expected, both moxifloxacin and dofetilide gave QTc increases with a maximum of ~ 20 ms. There was a significant increase in the sensitivity to detect a QTc effect when using the "one-step" method. The minimal detectable difference was 1.6 ms for the "one-step" method compared with 6.2 ms for the conventional method. These analyses are consistent with the increased sensitivity described for the "one-step" method applied to studies in NHP. The increased sensitivity should enhance the ability to support an integrated assessment of the QTc prolongation liability for new drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.