Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39404472›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024

An Open-Source Implementation of the Scaffold Identification and Naming System (SCINS) and Example Applications.

Kamen P Petrov, Andreas Bender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kamen P PetrovPangea Bio, Pangea Botanica GmbH, Hardenbergstrasse 32, 10623 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-5178-5254
Andreas BenderPangea Bio, Pangea Botanica GmbH, Hardenbergstrasse 32, 10623 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6683-7546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organizing and partitioning sets of chemical structures is of considerable practical significance, e.g., in compound library analysis and the postprocessing of screening hit lists. Approaches such as unsupervised clustering are computationally demanding and dataset-dependent; on the other hand, rule-based methods, such as those based on Murcko scaffolds, have linear time complexity but are often too fine-grained, leading to a large number of singletons or sparsely populated classes. An alternative rule-based method that seeks to achieve an optimal balance when grouping compounds into sets is the 'Scaffold Identification and Naming System' (SCINS). To facilitate public use of this previously published method, here, we provide an open-source Python implementation of SCINS, dependent only on RDKit. We show that SCINS can be useful in identifying sparsely and densely populated regions in chemical space in large databases, here exemplified with Enamine REAL Diverse and ChEMBL. We find that Enamine REAL Diverse covers a much smaller SCINS space relative to ChEMBL, whereas the opposite is true when Murcko and generic Murcko scaffolds are considered. Additionally, we show that SCINS can result in chemically intuitive grouping of medium-sized sets of bioactive compounds, which can be useful in compound selection from virtual screening campaigns as well as postprocessing of experimental hit lists. Hence, in this work, we provide both an open-source implementation of SCINS and its characterization with relevant use cases.

Indexed as

CheminformaticsClassificationDatabases, ChemicalCluster AnalysisData CurationInformation Storage and RetrievalMolecular Structure

Identifiers

PMID39404472
PMCPMC11523071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.