ArticleMolecular informatics2024
ERL-ProLiGraph: Enhanced representation learning on protein-ligand graph structured data for binding affinity prediction.
Article in Molecular informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ERL-ProLiGraph: Enhanced representation learning on protein-ligand graph structured data for binding affinity prediction.Molecular informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity (PLBA) is pivotal in drug development, as accurate estimations of PLBA expedite the identification of promising drug candidates for specific targets, thereby accelerating the drug discovery process. Despite substantial advancements in PLBA prediction, developing an efficient and more accurate method remains non-trivial. Unlike previous computer-aid PLBA studies which primarily using ligand SMILES and protein sequences represented as strings, this research introduces a Deep Learning-based method, the Enhanced Representation Learning on Protein-Ligand Graph Structured data for Binding Affinity Prediction (ERL-ProLiGraph). The unique aspect of this method is the use of graph representations for both proteins and ligands, intending to learn structural information continued from both to enhance the accuracy of PLBA predictions. In these graphs, nodes represent atomic structures, while edges depict chemical bonds and spatial relationship. The proposed model, leveraging deep-learning algorithms, effectively learns to correlate these graphical representations with binding affinities. This graph-based representations approach enhances the model's ability to capture the complex molecular interactions critical in PLBA. This work represents a promising advancement in computational techniques for protein-ligand binding prediction, offering a potential path toward more efficient and accurate predictions in drug development. Comparative analysis indicates that the proposed ERL-ProLiGraph outperforms previous models, showcasing notable efficacy and providing a more suitable approach for accurate PLBA predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.