ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024
Identifying modifiable factors associated with neuroimaging markers of brain health.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modifiable traits and genetic associations with grey matter volume in mid-to-late adulthood: a population-based study in the UK biobank.npj aging · 2025Article
- Identifying modifiable factors associated with neuroimaging markers of brain health.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsBrain structural alterations begin long before the presentation of brain disorders; therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate a wide range of influencing factors on neuroimaging markers of brain health.
methodsUtilizing data from 30,651 participants from the UK Biobank, we explored associations between 218 modifiable factors and neuroimaging markers of brain health. We conducted an exposome-wide association study using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) technique. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were further employed to estimate potential nonlinear correlations. Weighted standardized scores for neuroimaging markers were computed based on the estimates for individual factors. Finally, stratum-specific analyses were performed to examine differences in factors affecting brain health at different ages.
resultsThe identified factors related to neuroimaging markers of brain health fell into six domains, including systematic diseases, lifestyle factors, personality traits, social support, anthropometric indicators, and biochemical markers. The explained variance percentage of neuroimaging markers by weighted standardized scores ranged from 0.5% to 7%. Notably, associations between systematic diseases and neuroimaging markers were stronger in older individuals than in younger ones.
conclusionThis study identified a series of factors related to neuroimaging markers of brain health. Targeting the identified factors might help in formulating effective strategies for maintaining brain health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.