ReviewRevista de neurologia2024
[Commercial devices for monitoring symptoms in Parkinson's disease: benefits, limitations and trends].
Review in Revista de neurologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Treatment of PD requires accurate assessment of motor and non-motor symptoms, which is often complicated by subjectivity in reporting symptoms, and the limited availability of neurologists. Commercial wearable devices, which monitor PD symptoms continuously and outside the clinical setting, have appeared to address these challenges. These devices include PKG™, Kinesia 360™, Kinesia U™, PDMonitor™ and STAT-ON™. These devices use advanced technologies, including accelerometers, gyroscopes and specific algorithms to provide objective data on motor symptoms, such as tremor, dyskinesia and bradykinesia. Despite their potential, the adoption of these devices has been limited, due to concerns about their accuracy, complexity of use and the lack of independent validation. The correlation between the measurements obtained from these devices and traditional clinical observations varies, and their usability and patient adherence are critical areas for improvement. Validation and usability studies with a sufficient number of patients, standardised protocols and integration with hospitals' IT systems are essential to optimise their usefulness and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.