Observational studyRevista de neurologia2024
[Glycemic management in the stroke unit and its relationship with morbidity and mortality].
Observational study in Revista de neurologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for short-term mortality in ICU stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the treatment of hyperglycemia in the stroke unit, and to compare the morbidity and mortality of patients treated with an intravenous (iv) insulin therapy protocol compared to subcutaneous (sc) insulin when reaching glycemia levels of = 155 mg/dL. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe performed a prospective observational study of patients admitted to our stroke unit between July and October 2022. Demographic, glycemic and prognostic variables were collected. Glycemic variability was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the mean individual glycemia during the first 24-72 hours. Acute complications during admission and mortality at discharge and at 3 months were determined. The variables were analysed by subgroup according to the insulin regime in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) or stress hyperglycemia.
resultsThe sample consisted of 181 patients, of whom 63.5% were male, with a mean age of 74.2 (SD: 11.6) years. 25.4% required insulin due to glycemia = 155 mg/dL (18 patients iv and 28 sc). 31.5% had DM2 (82.6% of the group receiving insulin and 14% of group without insulin). The group receiving insulin presented higher levels of glycemic variability, at 33.3 (SD: 21.7) mg/dL vs. 11.7 (SD: 7) mg/dL (p < 0.01), more acute complications (43.5% vs. 19.2%; p < 0.01) and higher mortality at 3 months (19.5% vs. 6.6%; p = 0.04) than the group without insulin, and no differences were observed between the type of insulin regime in the subgroups with DM2 or stress hyperglycemia.
conclusionsThe patients with glycemia = 155 mg/dL presented higher levels of glycemic variability, acute complications and mortality at 3 months, and no differences were observed in the type of insulin regime, regardless of whether they had DM2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.