Trial reportHistopathology2025
Accuracy of the LaserSAFE technique for detecting positive surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: blind assessment and inter-rater agreement analysis.
Trial report in Histopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03317990 (A Single Blinded, IDEAL Stage 3, Multi-Centre, Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess NeuroSAFE Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single Blinded, IDEAL Stage 3, Multi-Centre, Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess NeuroSAFE Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) vs Standard Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) in Men With Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- NeuroSAFE-guided robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard RARP: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Current role of HistologPathologica · 2026Pooled it
- De-escalation surgery for localized prostate cancer: rationale and future direction of precision prostatectomy.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Intraoperative Techniques Aiding Margin Assessment and Nerve Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Use of parallel fluorescent confocal microscopy for detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma.BJU international · 2026Article
- Intraoperative margin assessment using fluorescence confocal microscopy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a first experience.BJU international · 2026Observational
- Delphi consensus on ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- Deep learning for fluorescence confocal microscopy image interpretation in radical prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- Feasibility and workflow analysis of confocal microscopy in robot-assisted prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- New evidence and novel techniques for assessing intraoperative margins during radical prostatectomy.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Article
- Nerve-Sparing in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Advantages and Pitfalls of Current Strategies and Technologies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Contemporary Evidence for Optimization of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes Using Advanced Imaging Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The evolution of radical prostatectomy: a scoping review on surgical techniques and integration of surgeon-assisting concepts into the surgical workflow.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Interventional pathologist and intraoperative surgical margin evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens ex-vivo confocal microscopyPathologica · 2025Article
- Validation of Artificial Intelligence-enhanced Stimulated Raman Histopathology for Intraoperative Margin Assessment During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Results from the ROBOSPEC Study.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Laser Confocal Microscopy May Be a Useful Tool in Neuropathological Intraoperative Examination.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Confocal Laser Microscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A New Procedure in the Pathology Laboratory Workflow.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectivesFluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a new imaging modality capable of generating digital microscopic resolution scans of fresh surgical specimens, and holds potential as an alternative to frozen section (FS) analysis for intra-operative assessment of surgical margins. Previously, we described the LaserSAFE technique as an application of FCM for margin assessment in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Histolog® scanner. This study describes the accuracy and inter-rater agreement of FCM imaging compared to corresponding paraffin-embedded analysis (PA) among four blinded pathologists for the presence of positive surgical margins (PSM). MATERIALS AND
methodsRARP specimens from patients enrolled in the control arm of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study (NCT03317990) were analysed from April 2022 to February 2023. Prostate specimens were imaged using the Histolog® scanner before formalin fixation and PA. Four trained assessors, blinded to PA, reviewed and analysed FCM images of the posterolateral prostatic surface.
resultsA total of 31 prostate specimens were included in the study. PA per lateral side of the prostate identified 11 instances of positive margins. Among the four histopathologists included in our study, FCM achieved a sensitivity of 73-91 and specificity of 94-100% for the presence of PSM. Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater agreement on PSM was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.64-0.92), indicating substantial agreement.
conclusionThis blinded analysis of FCM versus PA among histopathologists with different experience levels demonstrated high accuracy and substantial inter-rater agreement for diagnosing PSM. This supports the role of the FCM as an alternative to FS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.