Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403832›Full record

Trial reportHistopathology2025

Accuracy of the LaserSAFE technique for detecting positive surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: blind assessment and inter-rater agreement analysis.

Ricardo Almeida-Magana, Matthew Au, Tarek Al-Hammouri, Manju Mathew, Kate Dinneen, Larissa S T Mendes, Eoin Dinneen, Willem Vreuls, Greg Shaw, Alex Freeman and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Histopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03317990 (A Single Blinded, IDEAL Stage 3, Multi-Centre, Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess NeuroSAFE Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03317990 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Single Blinded, IDEAL Stage 3, Multi-Centre, Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess NeuroSAFE Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) vs Standard Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) in Men With Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2018 to 2027Enrolled407ConditionsProstate CancerArmsNeuroSAFE procedure, Standard RARP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Current role of HistologPathologica · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ricardo Almeida-MaganaDepartment of Targeted Intervention, University College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-1649
Matthew AuDepartment of Targeted Intervention, University College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-531X
Tarek Al-HammouriDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-0545
Manju MathewCentre for Medical Imaging, University College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5854-740X
Kate DinneenDepartment of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1613-5503
Larissa S T MendesDepartment of Targeted Intervention, University College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2417-1109
Eoin DinneenDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-3257
Willem VreulsDepartment of Histopathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6661-6017
Greg ShawDepartment of Targeted Intervention, University College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-2100
Alex FreemanDepartment of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-3791
Aiman HaiderDepartment of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-4245

Funding

NIHR Research for Patient Benefit PB-PG-1216-20013The Rosetrees Trust 566412WEISS Health Challenge 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectivesFluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a new imaging modality capable of generating digital microscopic resolution scans of fresh surgical specimens, and holds potential as an alternative to frozen section (FS) analysis for intra-operative assessment of surgical margins. Previously, we described the LaserSAFE technique as an application of FCM for margin assessment in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Histolog® scanner. This study describes the accuracy and inter-rater agreement of FCM imaging compared to corresponding paraffin-embedded analysis (PA) among four blinded pathologists for the presence of positive surgical margins (PSM). MATERIALS AND

methodsRARP specimens from patients enrolled in the control arm of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study (NCT03317990) were analysed from April 2022 to February 2023. Prostate specimens were imaged using the Histolog® scanner before formalin fixation and PA. Four trained assessors, blinded to PA, reviewed and analysed FCM images of the posterolateral prostatic surface.

resultsA total of 31 prostate specimens were included in the study. PA per lateral side of the prostate identified 11 instances of positive margins. Among the four histopathologists included in our study, FCM achieved a sensitivity of 73-91 and specificity of 94-100% for the presence of PSM. Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater agreement on PSM was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.64-0.92), indicating substantial agreement.

conclusionThis blinded analysis of FCM versus PA among histopathologists with different experience levels demonstrated high accuracy and substantial inter-rater agreement for diagnosing PSM. This supports the role of the FCM as an alternative to FS.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedObserver VariationProstateSensitivity and Specificityfluorescence confocal microscopyfrozen section analysismargin assessmentprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39403832
PMCPMC11707496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.