ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024
Video head impulse gain is impaired in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-related phenotypic differences in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2: a nationwide registry study from Serbia.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Video head impulse gain is impaired in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThis study was undertaken to examine vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) characteristics in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) using video head impulse testing (vHIT).
methodsVOR gain, refixation saccade prevalence, first saccade amplitude, onset latency, peak velocity, and duration were compared in DM1, DM2, age-matched normal controls, and patients with peripheral and central vestibulopathies.
resultsFifty percent of DM1 and 37.5% of DM2 patients demonstrated reduced VOR gain. Refixation saccade prevalence for horizontal canal (HC) and posterior canal (PC) was significantly higher in DM1 (101 ± 42%, 82 ± 47%) and DM2 (70 ± 45%, 61 ± 38%) compared to controls (40 ± 28% and 43 ± 33%, p < 0.05). The first saccade amplitudes and peak velocities were higher in HC and PC planes in DM1 and DM2 compared to controls (p < 0.05). HC slow phase eye velocity profiles in DM1 showed delayed peaks. The asymmetry ratio, which represents the percentage difference between the first and second halves of the slow phase eye velocity response, was therefore negative (-22.5 ± 17%, -2.3 ± 16%, and - 4.7 ± 8% in DM1, DM2, and controls). HC VOR gains were lower and gain asymmetry ratio was larger and negative in patients with DM1 with moderate to severe ptosis and a history of imbalance and falls compared to the remaining DM1 patients (p < 0.05). In peripheral vestibulopathies, saccade amplitude was larger, peak velocity was higher, and onset latency was shorter (p < 0.05) than in DM1. In central vestibulopathy (posterior circulation strokes), saccade peak velocity was higher, but amplitude and onset latency were not significantly different from DM1.
conclusionsVOR impairment is common in DM1 and DM2. In DM1, refixation saccade characteristics are closer to central than peripheral vestibulopathies. Delayed peaks in the vHIT eye velocity profile observed in patients with DM1 may reflect extraocular muscle weakness. VOR impairment and VOR asymmetry in DM1 are associated with imbalance and falls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.