Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403751›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2024

Identification of Preeclamptic Placenta in Whole Slide Images Using Artificial Intelligence Placenta Analysis.

Young Mi Jung, Seyeon Park, Youngbin Ahn, Haeryoung Kim, Eun Na Kim, Hye Eun Park, Sun Min Kim, Byoung Jae Kim, Jeesun Lee, Chan-Wook Park and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. BRIDGING COTYLEDON PATHOLOGY AND PERFUSION IN HEALTHY PRIMATE PREGNANCY.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Young Mi Jung *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7877-4450
Seyeon Park *Department of Medical Device Development, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6267-958X
Youngbin AhnDepartment of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3588-4537
Haeryoung KimDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-9081
Eun Na KimDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2992-7881
Hye Eun ParkDepartment of Pathology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-2827
Sun Min KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-3937
Byoung Jae KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-997X
Jeesun LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-2364
Chan-Wook ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1290-6438
Joong Shin ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-0477
Jong Kwan JunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0242-1736
Young-Gon KimDepartment of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2148-1299
Seung Mi LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2543-0408

Funding

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute 23ZR1100National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1F1A1046707Seoul National University Hospital 0320230180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreeclampsia (PE) is a hypertensive pregnancy disorder linked to placental dysfunction, often involving pathological lesions like acute atherosis, decidual vasculopathy, accelerated villous maturation, and fibrinoid deposition. However, there is no gold standard for the pathological diagnosis of PE and this limits the ability of clinicians to distinguish between PE and non-PE pregnancies. Recent advances in computational pathology have provided the opportunity to automate pathological analysis for diagnosis, classification, prediction, and prediction of disease progression. In this study, we assessed whether computational pathology could be used to identify PE placentas.

methodsA total of 168 placental whole-slide images (WSIs) of patients from Seoul National University Hospital (comprising 84 PE cases and 84 normal controls) were used for model development and internal validation. For external validation of the model, 76 placental slides (including 38 PE cases and 38 normal controls) were obtained from the Boramae Medical Center (BMC). To establish standard criteria for diagnosing PE and distinguishing it from controls using placental WSIs, patch characteristics and quantification of terminal and intermediate villi were employed. In unsupervised learning,

resultsUsing ensemble modeling, we developed a model to identify PE placentas. The model showed good performance (area under the precision-recall curve [AUPRC], 0.771; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.752-0.790), with 77.3% of sensitivity and 71.1% of specificity, whereas the clinical feature model showed an AUPRC 0.713 (95% CI, 0.694-0.732) with 55.6% sensitivity and 86.8% specificity. External validation of the predictive model employing the BMC-derived set of placental slides also showed good discrimination (AUPRC, 0.725; 95% CI, 0.720-0.730).

conclusionThe proposed computational pathology model demonstrated a strong ability to identify preeclamptic placentas. Computational pathology has the potential to improve the identification of PE placentas.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePlacentaPre-EclampsiaAdultAlgorithmsArea Under CurveCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPregnancyROC CurveArtificial IntelligencePlacentaPreeclampsiaUnsupervised Learning

Identifiers

PMID39403751
PMCPMC11473260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.