ArticleDigital health
Impact of a new post-emergency teleconsultation procedure on overcrowding.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Saint Vincent de Paul Hospital is using a post-emergency teleconsultation solution (TELESCOPE). Target patients are discharged early, freeing up examination rooms and hospital beds, and the patient's clinical evolution is monitored by teleconsultation 24 hours after discharge. This study aims to evaluate this pioneering procedure, firstly to assess the impact of TELESCOPE on ED overcrowding, and secondarily to evaluate 72-hour post-emergency hospitalization rates, throughput times, and patient satisfaction. Methods: This is a prospective, comparative, before/after type study. The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) score was used to measure the impact of TLC on ED congestion. It was calculated every hour, every day during the two study periods. The 72-hour post-emergency hospitalization rates were cross-compared for the patients who had a TLC, those who did not have a TLC during the same period, and those from the control period. The patient flow was evaluated by comparing the average length of stay of patients invited to a TLC against those from the control period. The patient's satisfaction was measured through a telephone survey. Findings: The mean difference in NEDOCS score is -3.1 [-4.14; -1.85]. Compared to the control phase, ED spent an additional 160 hours at a 'normal' level during the test period. The time spent in the 'busy' or 'overcrowded' categories was reduced by 129 and 19 hours. There is a significant reduction in the hospitalization rate between teleconsultation patients and all other patients. The patients discharged and invited to a TLC waited 87 minutes longer on average [56 minutes; 119 minutes]. Patient satisfaction is high (91.8%). Interpretation: Additional statistical strength would be needed to prove a reduction in overcrowding. The low hospitalization rate reflects adequate recruitment. ED visit times were unexpectedly longer. TELESCOPE seems useful for defining a new type of care. A further multicentre study is scheduled for 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.