Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403561›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2024

Three doses of Sars-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in older adults result in similar antibody responses but reduced cellular cytokine responses relative to younger adults.

Geir Bredholt, Marianne Sævik, Hanne Søyland, Thor Ueland, Fan Zhou, Rishi Pathirana, Anders Madsen, Juha Vahokoski, Sarah Lartey, Bente E Halvorsen and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04706390 (Comparison of the Immune Response to Natural COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04706390 recruitingnot on this map

Comparison of the Immune Response to Natural COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2021 to 2030Enrolled2,500ConditionsCovid19Armscovid-19 vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The ageing immune system and its battle with viruses.The Journal of general virology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Geir BredholtDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Marianne SævikDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Hanne SøylandDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Thor UelandFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Fan ZhouInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Rishi PathiranaInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Anders MadsenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Juha VahokoskiInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sarah LarteyInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bente E HalvorsenFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Tuva B DahlResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Mai-Chi TrieuInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kristin G-I MohnInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Karl Albert BrokstadInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Pål AukrustFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Camilla TøndelDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nina LangelandDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bjørn BlombergDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Rebecca Jane CoxInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bergen COVID-19 Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Booster COVID-19 vaccinations are used to protect the elderly, a group vulnerable to severe disease. We compared humoral and cellular immunity in older versus younger adults up to eight months after administering a BNT16b2 booster vaccine dose. Next, we analyzed the plasma levels of soluble T cell activation/exhaustion markers. Methods: Home-dwelling older adults (n = 68, median age 86) and younger healthcare workers (n = 35, median age 39), previously vaccinated with two doses of BNT162b2, were given a booster dose at ten months after the initial dose. Our analysis consisted of spike-specific IgG, neutralizing antibodies, memory B cells, IFN-γ and IL-2 secreting T cells and soluble T cell exhaustion/activation markers. Results: Following the initial two doses, the elderly cohort exhibited lower humoral and IFN-γ responses compared to younger adults. The booster dose increased the humoral responses in both older and younger adults. At two months after the booster dose, older and younger vaccinees had comparable levels of antibodies and the responses were maintained up to 18 months. The younger cohort elicited an increase in the cellular response, while no increase was detected in the elderly. The elderly had higher plasma levels of soluble forms of the T cell activation/exhaustion markers CD25 and TIM-3, which inversely correlated with age and T-cell cytokine responses. This suggests that these markers may be related to the observed dysfunctional cellular cytokine response in older adults. However, both elderly and younger adults who experienced breakthrough infections after booster vaccination, elicited more robust humoral and IFN-γ responses. Conclusions: The booster dose elicited neutralizing and spike-specific antibody responses in the elderly that were comparable with that of the younger cohort. However, the lack of a strong cellular cytokine response to the third dose in the elderly may explain their vulnerability to severe infection and may be a consequence of exhausted or senescent T cell responses. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04706390).

Indexed as

AgingInterferon-gammaMemory B cellsmRNA vaccinesNeutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2T-lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID39403561
PMCPMC11472110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.