Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403560›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2024

Medical Student Preferences on Examination Scheduling at a US Allopathic Medical School - Survey Study.

Avery Funkhouser, Anna V Blenda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Avery FunkhouserUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville; Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9287-7683
Anna V BlendaUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville; Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7669-3120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville examines medical students' preferences and concerns regarding exam scheduling, focusing on the schedule's impact on student academic performance and well-being. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to second, third, and fourth year medical students, receiving a 53% response rate. The survey, consisting of 11 multiple-choice questions and one open-ended question, assessed preferences for exam days, weeks, sequence of different types of exams, and the timing of schedule releases. Results: Evaluation using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis revealed a strong preference for scheduling Biomedical Science (BMS) exams on Fridays, avoiding weeks with holidays, and separating BMS exams from Integrated Practice of Medicine (IPM) assessments. Students reported that concurrent IPM content delivery during BMS exam weeks negatively impacted their academic performance. Additionally, there was a significant demand for early release of exam schedules to better manage work-life balance. Discussion: These findings highlight the critical role of exam scheduling in influencing medical students' academic success and overall well-being, suggesting the need for early communication of schedules and equitable assessment planning.

Indexed as

calendarexamschedulingstudent preferencewell-being

Identifiers

PMID39403560
PMCPMC11472763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.