ArticleHeliyon2024
Uncertainties of healthcare professionals and informal caregivers in rare diseases: A systematic review.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caring for Rare Genetic Disease: A Vision for the Future.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- The rare disease tree: adolescent voices, family narratives, and health professionals' views in Greece.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Interpretative phenomenological analysis and genetic counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Review
- Exploring burnout and uncertainty in healthcare professionals: a path analysis within the context of rare diseases.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uncertainties, defined as metacognitive awareness of ignorance, are an essential part of medicine. Consequently, healthcare professionals (HCPs) as well as informal caregivers face them inevitably. Depending on the interpretation of uncertainties and the existence of available resources to cope with them, uncertainties might have serious consequences. Studies showed higher burnout-rates and reduced psychosocial well-being of HCPs and informal caregivers. Especially rare diseases are linked with a variety of uncertainties, as knowledge about specific diseases is often limited which might result in a higher burden of both groups. This review aimed at summarizing studies dealing with HCPs' and informal caregivers' uncertainties in the context of rare diseases. We searched five databases and screened 11.236 records for title/abstract and 105 records for full-text. Finally, 24 studies were subjected to quality assessment and data extraction using narrative synthesis. Five studies focused on HCPs, 19 on informal caregivers. Results were clustered using an existing taxonomy differentiating three categories of uncertainty (scientific, practical and personal) and issues, specifying particular uncertain situations or circumstances. Only five of the included studies investigated the perspective of HCPs, indicating a research gap of the topic within this group. Reports were mostly limited to practical and scientific uncertainties. Concerning scientific uncertainties, information procurement showed up as a special facet in rare diseases. Informal caregivers reported the whole variety of scientific, practical and personal uncertainties, leading to psychological consequences such as fear, confusion and worry. This review provides an overview of categories and assigned issues of uncertainties HCPs and informal caregivers experience in relation to rare diseases and psychological consequences. Results can be used in the development of trainings, to teach effective coping strategies when dealing with uncertainties or offers of psychosocial support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.