ArticleHeliyon2024
Disproportionality analysis of drug-induced dry mouth using data from the United States food and drug administration adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of oral frailty prevalence among older hospitalized patients.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Validity and reliability of the total rating of eye, nasal, and dry-mouth (TREND) score.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Xerostomia as a Rare Adverse Effect of Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil: A Case Report With Recurrence After Rechallenge.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Buccodental Toxicities Induced by Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients Diagnosed with Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Literature Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Medication-Induced Xerostomia: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Salivary Flow, Intraoral Aching, and Anxiety.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced dry mouth is an adverse reaction that can significantly affect the quality of life and mental state of patients. In this study, we aimed to identify the most common drugs associated with dry mouth using data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: We accessed data from the FAERS database between the first quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2024. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities was used to identify reports of dry mouth, and disproportionality analyses (reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker) were performed to examine the risk signals for dry mouth and its causative drugs. Results: A total of 75,899 adverse event reports were related to dry mouth. Tiotropium bromide monohydrate (2080 cases) was associated with the majority of dry mouth cases. Disproportionality analysis revealed that the top five drugs with the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR) were darifenacin, solifenacin succinate, fesoterodine fumarate, tolterodine tartrate, and niraparib. Moreover, eight of the top 19 drugs that caused dry mouth were not identified as having major side effects in the package inserts. Conclusion: Tiotropium bromide monohydrate was the most frequently reported drug for dry mouth, whereas darifenacin had the highest ROR. Collectively, our findings emphasize the necessity for improved recognition and management of drug-induced dry mouth, particularly for medications not adequately flagged for this side effect in their labels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.