ArticleHeliyon2024
Sowing depth stability analysis and test verification of no-tillage planter parallel 4-bar row unit.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and testing of the key technology of the cotton direct seeding machine.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sowing depth stability and consistency of the no-tillage planter, particularly the high-speed operation, are poor. A reason for this is that the structure and parameter selection of no-tillage planter row unit profiling mechanism are unreasonable. The stability and consistency of sowing depth is beneficial when the upper and lower links of the parallel 4-bar profiling mechanism (PFPM) are parallel to the ground, but this principle is not satisfied on the uneven no-till soil. To improve the stability of gauge wheels downforce (GWD) and sowing depth of no-tillage planter row unit. The variation law of spring additional downforce (SAD) with tilt angle of parallel 4-bar profiling mechanism (PFPM) and connection offset of spring is discussed by constructing the steady state analysis matrix equation of PFPM. Additionally, the influence of tilt angle of PFPM and SAD on the stability of the sowing depth was analyzed. Based on the single factor control variable test method, bench and field tests were conducted. The test results show that the SAD increases nonlinearly with the increase in the degree of tilt of PFPM from downward to upward. Under the condition that four springs are installed and the tilt angle of PFPM is between (-20°-20°), the maximum SAD is 485.95 N, 1236.64 N, and 2258.05 N when the spring connection offset is 44 mm, 79 mm, and 115 mm, respectively. When the tilt angle is 8° upward, the GWD increases by 429 N, 575 N, and 984 N, GWD stability increases by 42.31 %, 56.16 %, and 50.29 %, and ditching depth stability increases by 30.00 %, 12.50 %, and 30.00 % compared with that of the control group at the sowing speed of 8, 10, and 12 km/h, respectively. At the sowing speed of 10 km/h, when the PFPM is operated with spring-free and additional springs, the average GWD increases by 353 N, and the stability of GWD and ditching depth increases by 34.38 % and 20.00 %, respectively. The results showed that the tilt upward of PFPM and SAD were beneficial to improve the stability of the GWD and sowing depth of the no-tillage planter row unit. The results not only verify the correctness of theoretical analysis, but also provide theoretical basis for the design and application adjustment of high-speed no-tillage planter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.