Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403487›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

How to go green? Exploring public attention and sentiment towards waste sorting behaviors on Weibo platform: A study based on text co-occurrence networks and deep learning.

Feixue Sui, Hengxu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feixue SuiCapital University of Economics and Business, College of Business Administration, Beijing, China.
Hengxu ZhangShandong Agricultural University, College of Economics and Management (Business College), Taian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attention and sentiment of the public are crucial for better implementation of waste sorting behaviors and moving towards green living. In this study, web scraping technology was used to collect 367,856 Weibo posts related to waste sorting from Sina Weibo. Utilizing text co-occurrence networks, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling, and a deep learning model combining the Affective Cognitive Model (OCC) with Long Short-Term Memory Model (LSTM) (referred to as OCC-LSTM), we comprehensively understand the text at both micro and macro levels, analyzing the attention and sentiment of the public towards waste sorting behaviors on the Sina Weibo platform. Several important findings emerged from the empirical results. First, highly engaging posts were predominantly published by users with a large following, and the number of posts fluctuated over time. This reflects the influence of social hot topics and the timeliness of information dissemination. Second, there was heterogeneity in the user groups and their locations, often influenced by cultural differences due to geographical location. Third, positive sentiment towards waste sorting behavior was higher than negative sentiment on the Weibo platform. Moreover, public attention varied under different emotional influences concerning the topic of waste sorting behavior. The innovation of this study lies in the development of a research framework combining co-occurrence networks and deep learning, expanding the analysis on both micro and macro levels. This framework broadens the research paradigms and dimensions of public perception in waste sorting. This study is significant for promoting waste sorting behaviors and implementing climate policies.

Indexed as

OCC-LSTM modelSentiment analysisText co-occurrence networkText miningWaste sorting

Identifiers

PMID39403487
PMCPMC11471487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.