ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Improved staffing policies and practices in healthcare based on a conceptual model.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- OSH inspector ratio to strengthen decent workplace safety and health: a cross-regional trend analysis research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Staffing policies are critical in healthcare facilities. However, problems from a mismatch between staff numbers requirements and offers are frequently encountered. This research examines the joint effects of quantitative and qualitative staff mismatch in a healthcare organization in China to understand how staffing management policies affect staffing adequacy and how staffing adequacy leads to important human resource (HR) outcomes. Methods: In a previous study, we identified four dimensions of staffing management policies, namely decision-making, data management, productivity optimization, and title vs. competency. Based on this categorization, an 11-item scale was generated and evaluated for psychometric quality. A quantitative study was conducted with 1,323 healthcare professionals (including clinical and administrative staff) working at the hospital, matched by dyads and teams. A conceptual model with work engagement as a mediator between quantitative staffing adequacy interactions and qualitative staffing adequacy was tested with structural equations. Results: The findings indicate that staffing policies do exert effects on staffing adequacy. These findings further indicate that quantitative and qualitative staffing adequacy interact in explaining work engagement and team performance and that the moderated mediation occurs as hypothesized. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that both types of staffing adequacies contribute to higher team performance via a heightened sense of work engagement from healthcare professionals. Furthermore, a modulation is observed between the two types of staffing adequacies during the promotion of higher team performance. The supported model is helpful in improving staffing management policies and increasing staffing fit so as to improve hospital performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.