ReviewChinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine2024
Evolution of transbronchial needle aspiration needles: Over the last half century.
Review in Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of three different puncture techniques for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Trial
- Macroscopic on-site evaluation based on core tissues length and weight during EBUS-TBNA using 22-gauge needles.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Surgical nodal sampling established by Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8 is essential for accurate lung cancer staging.JTCVS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a commonly used sampling approach in the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy as well as peripheral lesions. As a very important tool, the continued innovation of TBNA needles is a vital driving force for the development of the technique. Although TBNA plays an important role in interventional pulmonology, there are no clear standards guiding operators to choose an appropriate needle for their operation. In recent decades, with the advent of endobronchial ultrasound-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA), the real-time visualization of TBNA has been enabled. These modern TBNA needles, such as ViziShot2, FLEX 19G, Acquire FNB, and EchoTip ProCore, have made significant progress in specimen collection, convenience, and safety, though still remain grounded in the basic premise and initial upgrades to the original conventional TBNA (cTBNA) needles. This review introduced the developmental history of WANG cTBNA needles, and summarized the lessons of success and failure and the enlightenments for currently used EBUS- and other emerging TBNA needles, aiming to provide a significant reference for pulmonologists who lived through the cTBNA era and for junior physicians who start working in the EBUS-TBNA era. Despite its long history, TBNA is still playing significant roles in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases. A deeper understanding from the historical perspectives would facilitate continued innovations in the field of TBNA and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.