ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Application of metabolic phase-specific modified nutrition risk in critically ill score: a prospective observational study in critically ill patients.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between energy adequacy and clinical outcomes in septic intensive care unit patients stratified by modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill score.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Article
- An enhanced nutrition support system is associated with greater adequacy of enteral nutrition in long-term ICU patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Lactate-to-albumin ratio as an independent predictor of mortality in critically ill patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The prevalence of malnutrition in intensive care units (ICU) is high and can be caused by poor intake or absorption of nutrients in the digestive track, as well as disease-related inflammation. As strong catabolism restricts nutrient supply and potentially leads to subsequent malnutrition, appropriate nutrition should be provided based on the metabolic status. However, nutritional support strategies for considering the metabolic phase are not well established. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a strategy for nutritional support in each phase by implementing a phase-specific modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on all adult patients admitted to the medical ICU for at least 36 h at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between September 2020 and September 2022. Patient nutrition assessment (mNUTRIC score), clinical information, and nutritional supply (calories and proteins) were measured twice, in the acute phase (measured at 2 days) and late phase (measured at 7 days). The relationship between nutritional supply and 28-day mortality was analyzed using multiple logistic regression according to the mNUTRIC score in the acute and late phases. Risk factors related to 28-day mortality were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions. Results: Of the 631 patients admitted to the ICU during the study period, 613 were included in the acute phase and 361 patients were included in the late phase. Nutritional supply was associated with 28-day mortality, with high mNUTRIC scores in both the acute and late phases. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that a high mNUTRIC score [hazard ratio (HR) 3.20 and 2.52, respectively], lactate >2.5 mg/dL were independent risk factors in both the acute and late phases. In addition, Albumin <2.5 mg/dL, the presence of neoplasm, and the need for dialysis in the acute phase, calorie adequacy <0.7 in the late phase (HR, 2.19) were identified as additional risk factors. Conclusion: The mNUTRIC score is a suitable tool for identifying critically ill patients who benefit from nutritional support. Nutritional supply should be considered for patients with high mNUTRIC scores in both the acute and late phases; however, careful supply should be provided in the acute phase and sufficient supply should be provided in the late phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.