ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024
Make it STING: nanotechnological approaches for activating cGAS/STING as an immunomodulatory node in osteosarcoma.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 'three-axis synergy' immunotherapeutic strategy for malignant bone tumors based on natural bioactives and bioactive materials.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Integrated Multiomic Profiling Enhances Risk Stratification and Prognostication in Canine Osteosarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Carnosic Acid Activates the STING/IRF3 Pathway to Induce Nitric Oxide-Mediated Apoptosis in Osteosarcoma Cells.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nanovaccines for lung cancer: Platforms, mechanistic insights, and translational challenges.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Navigating the immunosuppressive abyss: current hurdles and innovative breakthroughs in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for osteosarcoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Engineering immunity in osteosarcoma: nanomedicine strategies for overcoming immune evasion.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival outcomes and a nomogram for predicting overall survival in chondroblastic osteosarcoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Decoding osteosarcoma from heterogeneity to precision therapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Interferon signaling and STING pathway in head and neck cancers: unlocking immune secrets and therapeutic frontiers.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Telomere-metabolism-immunity axis in sarcoma: Immune evasion mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- TRDMT1 methyltransferase gene knockout attenuates STING-based cell death signaling during self-extracellular RNA-mediated response in drug-induced senescent osteosarcoma cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Oncolytic virus therapy for osteosarcoma: mechanisms, opportunities, and challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Manipulating the cGAS-STING Axis: advancing innovative strategies for osteosarcoma therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Cellular crosstalk in the bone marrow niche.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is a highly aggressive bone cancer primarily affecting children, adolescents, and young adults. The current gold standard for treatment of osteosarcoma patients consists of two to three rounds of chemotherapy, followed by extensive surgical intervention from total limb reconstruction to amputation, followed by additional rounds of chemotherapy. Although chemotherapy has advanced the treatment of osteosarcoma significantly, the overall 5-year survival rate in resistant forms of osteosarcoma is still below 20%. The interaction between cancer and the immune system has long been recognized as a critical aspect of tumour growth. Tumour cells within the tumour microenvironment (TME) suppress antitumour immunity, and immunosuppressive cells and cytokines provide the extrinsic factors of tumour drug resistance. Emerging research demonstrates an immunostimulatory role for the cGAS/STING pathway in osteosarcoma, typically considered an immune-cold or immunosuppressed cancer type. cGAS/STING signalling appears to drive an innate immune response against tumours and potentiates the efficacy of other common therapies including chemo and radiotherapy. Nanotechnological delivery systems for improved therapy delivery for osteosarcoma have also been under investigation in recent years. This review provides an overview of cGAS/STING signalling, its divergent roles in the context of cancer, and collates current research which activates cGAS/STING as an adjuvant immunomodulatory target for the treatment of osteosarcoma. It will also discuss current nanotechnological delivery approaches that have been developed to stimulate cGAS/STING. Finally, it will highlight the future directions that we believe will be central to the development of this transformative field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.