Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403340›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Machine learning-driven survival prediction in gestational trophoblastic neoplasms: a focus on PSTT and ETT prognosis.

Sakhr Alshwayyat, Zena Haddadin, Mustafa Alshwayyat, Tala Abdulsalam Alshwayyat, Ramez M Odat, Mohammed Al-Mahdi Al-Kurdi, Saoussane Kharmoum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sakhr AlshwayyatFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Zena HaddadinFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Mustafa AlshwayyatFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Tala Abdulsalam AlshwayyatFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Ramez M OdatFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Mohammed Al-Mahdi Al-KurdiFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria.
Saoussane KharmoumMédical Oncology, Régional Hospital Center, Tangier, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor (ETT) have not been well summarized. Consequently, we conducted the largest to date series of samples of both types and employed machine learning (ML) to assess treatment effectiveness and develop accurate prognostic models for patients with GTN. Gestational choriocarcinoma (GCC) was used as the control group to show the clinical features of PTSS and ETT. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database provided the data used for this study's analysis. To identify the prognostic variables, we conducted Cox regression analysis and constructed prognostic models using five ML algorithms to predict the 5-year survival. A validation method incorporating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to validate the accuracy and reliability of the ML models. We also investigated the role of multiple therapeutic options using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: The study population comprised 725 patients. Among them, 139 patients had ETT, 107 had PSTT, and 479 had GCC. There were no significant differences in survival between the different tumor groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that metastasis was a significant prognostic factor for GCC, while older age and radiotherapy were significant prognostic factors for PTSS and ETT. ML models revealed that the Gradient Boosting classifier accurately predicted the outcomes, followed by the random forest classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, and multilayer perceptron models. The most significant contributing factors were tumor size, year of diagnosis, age, and race. Discussion: Our study provides a method for treatment and prognostic assessment of patients with GTN. The ML we developed can be used as a convenient individualized tool to facilitate clinical decision making.

Indexed as

clinical decision makingmachine learningplacentaprognosissurvival analysistreatment outcometrophoblastic tumor

Identifiers

PMID39403340
PMCPMC11471447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.