Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403295›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Variation of volatile flavor substances in salt-baked chicken during processing.

Hao Jiang, Shaobi Ou, Junjie Ye, Min Qian, Jinpei Wen, Heming Qi, Xiaofang Zeng, Wenhong Zhao, Weidong Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hao JiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Lingnan Specialty Food Science and Technology, College of Light Industry and Food Sciences, Key Laboratory of Green Processing and Intelligent Manufacturing of Lingnan Specialty Food, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Shaobi OuCollege of Light Industry and Food Sciences, Academy of Contemporary Agricultural Engineering Innovations, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Junjie YeCollege of Light Industry and Food Sciences, Academy of Contemporary Agricultural Engineering Innovations, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Min QianGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Lingnan Specialty Food Science and Technology, College of Light Industry and Food Sciences, Key Laboratory of Green Processing and Intelligent Manufacturing of Lingnan Specialty Food, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Jinpei WenFan-Fan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Heyuan 517001, China.
Heming QiScience and Technology Research Centre of China Customs, Beijing 100026, China.
Xiaofang ZengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Lingnan Specialty Food Science and Technology, College of Light Industry and Food Sciences, Key Laboratory of Green Processing and Intelligent Manufacturing of Lingnan Specialty Food, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Wenhong ZhaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Lingnan Specialty Food Science and Technology, College of Light Industry and Food Sciences, Key Laboratory of Green Processing and Intelligent Manufacturing of Lingnan Specialty Food, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Weidong BaiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Lingnan Specialty Food Science and Technology, College of Light Industry and Food Sciences, Key Laboratory of Green Processing and Intelligent Manufacturing of Lingnan Specialty Food, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salt-baked chicken was a traditional delicacy of Guangdong, but the effects of volatile flavor compounds at different stages of its processing remained unclear. This study utilized sensory analysis, e-nose, and GC-MS to investigate the changes in volatile flavor compounds during the processing of salt-baked chicken. The results indicated significant alterations in volatile flavor compounds at different stages of processing, resulting in flavor transitioning from the original flavor to salty, scorched, and fatty flavor. 75 volatile compounds were identified by GC-MS, with 15 key flavor compounds highlighted based on OAV, including aldehydes, alcohols, terpenes, heterocycles and esters. The research revealed the dynamic changes in volatile flavor compounds throughout the cooking process of salt-baked chicken and emphasized the important role of salt-baked in shaping its distinctive taste profile. These findings provided a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for enhancing and optimizing the authentic taste of this traditional dish, while fostering innovative advancements in prepared cuisine.

Indexed as

Electronic noseGas chromatography-mass spectrometryOdor activity valueSalt-baked chickenVolatile flavor compound

Identifiers

PMID39403295
PMCPMC11471589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.