ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2025
Minimally invasive exoscope-assisted coccygectomy: A novel approach for chronic refractory coccydynia.
Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Management of Coccydynia.Neurospine · 2026Review
- Advances in Coccygectomy: A Comprehensive Review Evaluating Surgical Techniques for Coccygodynia.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This technical note presents a novel minimally invasive exoscope assisted coccygectomy to treat chronic refractory coccydynia. Traditional treatments often fail to provide adequate relief for this debilitating condition, prompting the need to explore surgical approaches. Case Description: A 40-year-old female patient with persistent pain unresponsive to conservative treatments underwent this advanced procedure. Utilizing the Synaptive exoscope-microscope system, the surgery allowed for precise dissection and removal of affected coccygeal segments, with a focus on minimizing skin and soft tissue disruption to optimize wound healing and surgical site pain. Conclusion: Postoperative recovery showcased significant pain reduction and improved quality of life, emphasizing the method's potential for better outcomes and fewer complications. Despite the promising results, the limitations of a single-case study necessitate further research to establish long-term effectiveness across a broader patient population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.