Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403174›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2024

Amazonian amphibians: diversity, spatial distribution patterns, conservation and sampling deficits.

Marcos Penhacek, Thadeu Sobral Souza, Jessie Pereira Santos, Vinicius Guerra, Rodrigo Antônio Castro-Souza, Domingos de Jesus Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcos PenhacekPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Rua Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367, 78060-900, Cuiabá, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Rua Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367, 78060-900 Cuiabá Brazil.
Thadeu Sobral SouzaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Rua Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Rua Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367 Cuiabá, MT Brazil.
Jessie Pereira SantosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia Campinas, SP Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-9505
Vinicius GuerraInstituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais, Acervo Biológico da Amazônia Meridional, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Sinop, Brazil Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais, Acervo Biológico da Amazônia Meridional, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Sinop Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1912-1139
Rodrigo Antônio Castro-SouzaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Rua Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Rua Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367 Cuiabá, MT Brazil.
Domingos de Jesus RodriguesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Rua Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Rua Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367 Cuiabá, MT Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Amazon biome is home to the largest tropical forest on the planet and has the greatest global biodiversity on Earth. Despite this, several less charismatic taxonomic groups, such as amphibians, lack comprehensive studies on their species richness and spatial distribution in the Amazon Region. In this study, we investigated: i) patterns of richness and endemism of Amazonian amphibians across geopolitical and biogeographic divisions, ii) similarities between different Amazonian bioregions, iii) temporal trends in amphibian sampling, iv) conservation status of amphibians according to assessments of the IUCN and v) the importance of diverse data sources in building a robust database of amphibian occurrences. We aggregated data from four different sources: publicly accessible platforms, peer-reviewed articles, grey literature and fieldwork inventories spanning 15 years (2007-2021), ultimately compiling 160,643 records of 947 species across 7,418 sampled sites. The greatest diversity of species was found in Peru, Brazil and Ecuador, with notable amphibian diversity and endemism in regions such as the western basins and the Tapajós River Basin in the central-southern Amazon. Geographical analysis of species diversity revealed four distinct groups defined by latitudinal (the Amazon River) and longitudinal (the Juruá, Madeira and Tapajós Rivers) gradients, with low species similarity (< 40%), particularly in the basins of north-western Amazonia. Amphibian sampling in the Amazon has intensified since the 1950s with the establishment of important research centres such as INPA and the GOELD Museum in the Brazilian Amazon. Approximately 18% of Amazonian amphibian species face extinction risk, according to IUCN assessments, highlighting the need for comprehensive data sources to understand and conserve species in this megadiverse region. Our findings suggest that river systems likely influence Amazonian amphibian species composition due to biogeographic history, emphasising the need for robust taxonomic and spatial databases. This study, therefore, contributes a valuable large-scale dataset for Amazonian amphibians, guiding future research and strategies for amphibian conservation.

Indexed as

Amazon BasinAmphibiansbiodiversityNeotropical Regionsample completenesssample gaps

Identifiers

PMID39403174
PMCPMC11471977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.