ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Gaucher disease in Brazil: a comprehensive 16 year retrospective study on survival, cost, and treatment insights.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular and Genetic Aspects of Lipid Metabolism Disorders and Potential Targets for Gene Therapy.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026Review
- Development of a Lentiviral Vector for High-Yield Production of Synthetic and Recombinant GCase for Gaucher Disease Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gaucher's disease (GD), a lysosomal storage disorder, poses significant treatment challenges. This 23-year study assesses survival rates and treatment efficacy in Brazilian GD patients, integrating data from a 16-year cohort (2000-2015) and the TABNET/DATASUS medicines distribution data (1999-2022). Objective: To investigate the survival of GD patients in Brazil, identifying key risk factors and evaluating the impact of treatments funded by the Brazilian National Health System (SUS). Methodology: A 16-year retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Database of SUS. Patients diagnosed with GD and treated with Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) or Substrate Synthesis Inhibition (SSI) from 2000 to 2015 were included. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. The data from TABNET/DATASUS system from 1999 to 2022 was used to assess the trend in drug distribution beyond the main cohort. Results: The study included 1,234 patients. Survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 93.2% and 88.5%, respectively, with age and comorbidities like diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and Parkinson's disease significantly affecting survival. Patients who received doses lower than DDD (n = 880) demonstrated a survival probability of 91.8%. In contrast, those with doses equal to the DDD (n = 15) showed a 100% survival probability, as no events were observed in this group. The greater than DDD group (n = 339) exhibited a survival probability of 81%. A log-rank test indicated a borderline statistical significance ( Conclusion: This study provides insights into the survival rates and associated risk factors for GD patients in Brazil, contributing to the global understanding of GD and its management. While we acknowledge the inherent limitations of relying largely on electronic medical records and categorical codes, our findings underscore the need for early diagnosis, timely initiation of treatment, effective management of comorbidities, and personalized dosing strategies to improve patient outcomes. Future studies should aim to incorporate clinical verification of electronic data to further enhance the reliability and applicability of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.