Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403132›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024

How are US hospitals adopting artificial intelligence? Early evidence from 2022.

Redwan Bin Abdul Baten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ethical and Legal Implications of Implementing AI in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Redwan Bin Abdul BatenDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, Affiliate Faculty, Public Policy Program, CHHS, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5591-3494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

US hospitals are rapidly adopting artificial intelligence (AI), but there is a lack of knowledge about AI-adopting hospitals' characteristics, trends, and spread. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the 2022 American Hospital Association (AHA) data. The novel Hospital AI Adoption Model (HAIAM) is developed to categorize hospitals based on their AI adoption characteristics in the fields of (1) predicting patient demand, (2) optimizing workflow, (3) automating routine tasks, (4) staff scheduling, and (5) predicting staffing needs. Nearly one-fifth of US hospitals (1107 or 18.70%) have adopted some form of AI by 2022. The HAIAM shows that only 3.82% of hospitals are high adopters, followed by 6.22% moderate and 8.67% low adopters. Artificial intelligence adoption rates are highest in optimizing workflow (12.91%), while staff scheduling (9.53%) has the lowest growth rate. Hospitals with large bed sizes and outpatient surgical departments, private not-for-profit ownership, teaching status, and part of health systems are more likely to adopt different forms of AI. New Jersey (48.94%) is the leading hospital AI-adopting state, whereas New Mexico (0%) is the most lagging. These data can help policymakers better understand variations in AI adoption by hospitals and inform potential policy responses.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceHAIAMhospitalinnovationtechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID39403132
PMCPMC11472248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.