Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403111›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2024

Bridging vision and touch: advancing robotic interaction prediction with self-supervised multimodal learning.

Luchen Li, Thomas George Thuruthel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luchen LiDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas George ThuruthelDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the consequences of the agent's actions on its environment is a pivotal challenge in robotic learning, which plays a key role in developing higher cognitive skills for intelligent robots. While current methods have predominantly relied on vision and motion data to generate the predicted videos, more comprehensive sensory perception is required for complex physical interactions such as contact-rich manipulation or highly dynamic tasks. In this work, we investigate the interdependence between vision and tactile sensation in the scenario of dynamic robotic interaction. A multi-modal fusion mechanism is introduced to the action-conditioned video prediction model to forecast future scenes, which enriches the single-modality prototype with a compressed latent representation of multiple sensory inputs. Additionally, to accomplish the interactive setting, we built a robotic interaction system that is equipped with both web cameras and vision-based tactile sensors to collect the dataset of vision-tactile sequences and the corresponding robot action data. Finally, through a series of qualitative and quantitative comparative study of different prediction architecture and tasks, we present insightful analysis of the cross-modality influence between vision, tactile and action, revealing the asymmetrical impact that exists between the sensations when contributing to interpreting the environment information. This opens possibilities for more adaptive and efficient robotic control in complex environments, with implications for dexterous manipulation and human-robot interaction.

Indexed as

information fusion and compressionmulti-modal sensingphysical robotic interactionpredictive learningself-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39403111
PMCPMC11472251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.