ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024
A Qualitative Exploration of Sacred Moments in Radiation Oncology.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sacred Moments in Healthcare: An Evidence-Based Conceptual Model.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Review
- The Current Landscape of Sacred Moments Research: Reconsidering Meaning, Relationality, and Well-Being in Health Care.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- Moments of deep connection between clinicians and patients in oncology: a mixed-methods study of sacred moments.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Sacred Moment Experiences Among Internal Medicine Physicians.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: While there are many benefits to radiation oncology services, there can be emotional burdens in the care of patients with advanced cancer. Burnout is a prevalent problem in oncology. Existing literature suggests refocusing attention on providers' sense of purpose to protect against burnout. "Sacred moments" are moments of deep interconnection between people with accompanying spiritual emotions such as awe, joy, and gratitude. These moments naturally occur in health care settings, offering potential benefits to both patient and provider. Little is known about the prevalence and impact of sacred moments among health care workers in a radiation oncology setting. Methods and Materials: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study of 13 semi-structured interviews among physicians, registered nurses, and advanced practice providers of a radiation oncology consult service at a large National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center between March and May 2023. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify key themes. Data were systematically coded and analyzed in NVivo software and organized into a codebook organized by domains and themes. Results: Of the 13 health care workers interviewed, 12 interviewees reported experiencing at least one sacred moment during their clinical careers. None of the interviewees were initially familiar with the term; however, all understood the concept once explained. Interview findings were organized into four domains: (1) common elements, (2) impact, (3) barriers, and (4) provider reactions. Common elements included a moment of deep interconnection between provider and patient, often involving end-of-life patients. The impact of these moments was most commonly described as an increased sense of purpose in their role. Lack of time with patients was the most common barrier. Conclusions: Sacred moments are commonly experienced by health care workers in a radiation oncology consult service. They helped to humanize the patient, buffer against provider burnout, and increase a sense of purpose and job satisfaction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.