ArticleEuropean journal of public health2024
Examining health literacy in the Danish general population: a cross-sectional study on the associations between individual factors and healthcare-seeking behaviour.
Article in European journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring perceived access to and previous experiences with general practice and associations with health literacy in the Danish population.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Relationship between health literacy levels and breastfeeding self-efficacy perceptions of pregnant women.International breastfeeding journal · 2026Article
- Unravelling complex relationships between health literacy and shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study in patients attending rheumatology rehabilitation.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- How do health literacy and chronic disease influence the diagnostic evaluation of patients with lung cancer symptoms?Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Smoking status, symptom significance and healthcare seeking with lung cancer symptoms in the Danish general population.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knowledge about health literacy challenges among the general population is valuable for initiatives targeting social inequity in health. We investigated health literacy in various population groups and the impact of healthcare-seeking behaviour by analysing the associations between (i) lifestyle, socioeconomics, self-rated health, chronic disease, and health literacy and (ii) symptom burden, contact to general practitioner (GP), and health literacy. In total, 27 488 individuals participated in a population-based survey. Questionnaire data comprised information about symptoms, GP contact, lifestyle, self-rated health, chronic disease, and four aspects of health literacy: feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers, having sufficient information about health, having social support for health, and being able to actively engage with healthcare providers. Socioeconomics were obtained from registers. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression models were applied. Individuals who smoked, lived alone, had different ethnicity than Danish, and low self-rated health had more health literacy challenges reflected in lower scores for all aspects of health literacy. Individuals with high symptom burden and those who had presented a high absolute number of symptoms to their GP were less likely to have sufficient information about health and be able to actively engage, whereas individuals reporting GP contact with a high relative percentage of their symptoms were more likely to feel understood and supported by healthcare providers. Health literacy challenges are related to healthcare-seeking behaviour and several individual factors. To address social inequity in health and society, interventions aimed at both the individual and community-based health literacy are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.