ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2024
Force versus Response: Methods for Activating and Characterizing Mechanosensitive Ion Channels and GPCRs.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein force spectroscopy using magnetic tweezers: Slow and steady wins the race?Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- Cylindrical Crystallization of CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Piezo channels in tumors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Biophysical assays to test cellular mechanosensing: moving towards high throughput.Biophysical reviews · 2024Review
- Force versus Response: Methods for Activating and Characterizing Mechanosensitive Ion Channels and GPCRs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanotransduction is the process whereby cells convert mechanical signals into electrochemical responses, where mechanosensitive proteins mediate this interaction. To characterize these critical proteins, numerous techniques have been developed that apply forces and measure the subsequent cellular responses. While these approaches have given insight into specific aspects of many such proteins, subsequent validation and cross-comparison between techniques remain difficult given significant variations in reported activation thresholds and responses for the same protein across different studies. Accurately determining mechanosensitivity responses for various proteins, however, is essential for understanding mechanotransduction and potential physiological implications, including therapeutics. This critical review provides an assessment of current and emerging approaches used for mechanosensitive ion channel and G-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) stimulation and measurement, with a specific focus on the ability to quantitatively measure mechanosensitive responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.