ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Classification of Emerging Scoliosis in Congenital Scoliosis After Hemivertebra Resection and Short Segmental Fusion.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Limited fusion strategy for congenital scoliosis: is it truly one and done?Spine deformity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEmerging scoliosis (ES) is a rare phenomenon after hemivertebra (HV) resection and short segmental fusion. Since the introduction of the ES, there have been rare in-depth studies. The aim of the present study was to further analyze the characteristics, risk factors, treatment, and prognosis of ES.
methodsA retrospective study analyzed patients with congenital scoliosis due to a single HV who underwent posterior correction and short fusion from 2002 to 2022. ES was defined as a Cobb angle ≥20° from its initial value and an apical vertebra located ≥2 levels away from the fusion region. ES patients and non-ES patients were matched at a 1:2 ratio. Both demographics and radiological parameters were compared. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic analysis were used to identify the risk factors of ES.
resultsAmong 261 patients, 13 patients (5.0%) experienced ES. There were eight females and five males. The mean age of the ES patients at the time of primary surgery was 6.6 ± 3.7 years old (2.0-13.2 years old), with a mean follow-up of 64.2 ± 47.9 months (12-156 months). The ES could be further divided into three types: balance-related ES, complication-related ES, and separated ES. There were three balance-related ESs, six complication-related ESs, and four separated ESs. At the last follow-up, six patients were under observation, six patients underwent brace treatment, and one patient underwent revision surgery. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the magnitude of postoperative compensatory curve (CC) was an independent risk factor for ES (OR = 1.172, p = 0.014).
conclusionsES is an extraordinary phenomenon after HV resection and short fusion, and it can be divided into three types. The magnitude of postoperative CC was an independent risk factor for ES. According to the severity of ES, observation, brace, or surgery can be chosen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.