ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2024
Frequent callers contacting the Norwegian national emergency medical number 113: a retrospective study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequent users of the ambulance service in a Swedish region: a retrospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Disparities between two possible thresholds for frequent contacts to a Norwegian emergency medical communication centre: ≥5 contacts in one month vs. ≥12 contacts in three months.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCalling for help is the first link in the chain of survival; however, few studies have investigated the challenges faced by frequent callers (FCs) to emergency medical communication centres (EMCCs). This study aimed to explore the characteristics of FCs and the nature of their calls to the Bergen EMCC, Norway.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of all emergency calls to the Bergen EMCC over three consecutive years (2019-2021). Bergen is the second-largest city in Norway, and the Bergen EMCC and ambulance services are part of the specialist medical service, covering a population of 460,000. The Bergen EMCC receives approximately 60,000 emergency calls per year. The study population comprised all adults identified during emergency medical calls. FCs were defined as individuals who registered five or more calls over 12 consecutive months during the three-year period.
resultsThe analysis included approximately 50,000 individuals, who made > 90,000 calls during the study period. Of those, 1,594 (3.2%) were FCs, accounting for approximately one in four (21,339 of 90,085, 23.7%) calls. The FCs included more men (882 of 1,594 (55.3%) vs. 24,204 of 47,564 (50.9%)) and registered a lower proportion of calls with an acute degree of urgency (6,051 of 21,339 calls (28.4%) vs. 30,276 of 68,746 calls (44.0%)). Calls from FCs showed an even occurrence throughout the week, peaking between 19:00 h and 20:00 h. Compared with calls from non-FCs, calls from FCs had a higher proportion of 'no response/verbal referral to local emergency medical department' and involved a lower proportion of hospital transfers. The EMCC most frequently used the medical criterion 'Mental health problems/suicide' for calls from FCs.
conclusionsFCs were common, and more often men. The EMCC dispatched ambulances or admitted patients to hospitals less frequently following these calls. Many of these situations could be handled in other parts of the healthcare system, reducing the burden on EMCCs, and providing more suitable services for FCs. Thus, EMCCs should identify and adjust patient management to match their actual needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.