Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402648›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2024

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at delabeling low-risk penicillin allergies with consideration for sex and gender.

Mira Maximos, Sameer Elsayed, Colleen Maxwell, Sherilyn K D Houle, Ryan Pelletier, Brie McConnell, Andrew Pylypiak, John-Michael Gamble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mira MaximosSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, N2G 2C5, Canada.
Sameer ElsayedDepartments of Medicine and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON, Canada.
Colleen MaxwellSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, N2G 2C5, Canada.
Sherilyn K D HouleSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, N2G 2C5, Canada.
Ryan PelletierSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, N2G 2C5, Canada.
Brie McConnellSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, N2G 2C5, Canada.
Andrew PylypiakWoodstock General Hospital, Woodstock, ON, Canada.
John-Michael GambleSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, N2G 2C5, Canada. jm.gamble@uwaterloo.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately, 10% of people report a penicillin allergy; however, more than 90% can safely undergo delabeling after a detailed history, oral challenge, or other investigations such as penicillin skin testing (PST). Although PST is the gold standard, the results can be heterogeneous, and awaiting specialist assessment may take an inordinate amount of time. Therefore, oral provocation challenge has become acceptable for individuals with low-risk penicillin allergy histories. There also appears to be an association with increased prevalence of adverse drug reaction reporting in female individuals, which may translate to penicillin allergy prevalence; however, the evidence has not been assessed through a sex and gender lens. This systematic review will identify and synthesize the findings from studies that report measures of effectiveness and safety of interventions aimed at delabeling penicillin allergies in low-risk individuals. Information related to sex and gender will be extracted, where available, to understand potential differences in allergy reporting and patient outcomes.

methodsThe Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Centre for Review and Dissemination's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care will be used as frameworks for conducting this systematic review. The literature search will be conducted by a medical librarian (B. M. M.) and will consist of a search strategy to identify and retrieve published studies that meet our inclusion criteria. Studies that require penicillin skin testing (PST) as a step prior to other interventions will be excluded. Integrated knowledge translation involving co-design was carried out for this systematic review protocol creation. Data extraction will be conducted at four levels: (1) study level, (2) patient level, (3) intervention level, and (4) outcome level. A narrative descriptive synthesis of results and risk of bias of all included studies will be provided, and, if relevant, a meta-analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: The dissemination of findings from this knowledge synthesis to various stakeholders is intended to inform on options for evidence-based interventions to aid in delabeling penicillin allergies in individuals with a low risk of experiencing a hypersensitivity reaction. Detailed reporting on the characteristics of delabeling interventions as well as the effectiveness of similar interventions will benefit policy makers considering the implementation of a penicillin allergy delabeling protocol. Additionally, findings from this systematic review will report on the current evidence regarding the role of sex and gender in both the prevalence and outcomes associated with the presence of penicillin allergies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022336457.

Indexed as

Drug HypersensitivityPenicillinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicSex FactorsSkin TestsSystematic Reviews as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillinsAllergyAmoxicillinAntibioticBeta-lactamDelabelingHypersensitivityOral challengePenicillinTesting

Identifiers

PMID39402648
PMCPMC11472534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.