Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402631›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2024

The lived experience of co-production: Reflective accounts from the InCLUDE project.

Shayma Izzidien, Rachael Stemp, Sakab Akram, Sabbir Ahmed, Alay Rangel-Cristales, Karen Irvine, Shivani Sharma, Nick Midgley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Embedding Multiperspective Reflections in Co-Producing a Training Intervention for Care Home Staff: Understanding Group Members' Journeys and Impacts.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Public Involvement in Complex Theorising: A Co-Produced Logic Model of the Role of Context in Shaping Child Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Co-Development of the CoMUni Intervention: A Social-Media-Based Resource to Increase Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviours in UK Undergraduates.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shayma Izzidien *Anna Freud, London, UK. shayma.izzidien@annafreud.org.
Rachael Stemp *School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. rachael.stemp@annafreud.org.
Sakab AkramSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Sabbir AhmedSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Alay Rangel-CristalesAnna Freud, London, UK.
Karen IrvineSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Shivani SharmaCollege of Business and Social Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Nick MidgleyDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK.

Funding

NIHR Public Health Research MIDGLEY127422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe value of co-produced research in health and social care is increasingly recognised, but accounts into the processes and individual experiences of co-producing research are lacking. This paper describes the personal journeys of four researchers (two experts by foster caring experience and two experts by profession) throughout the life course of a co-produced research project exploring the barriers and facilitators to inclusive research in foster caring, the InCLUDE project.

methodsEach researcher kept a diary throughout the InCLUDE project of their personal reflections, questions, and learning. These were synthesised and reviewed by the researchers and two colleagues external to the team, and key themes were extracted.

resultsNarratives constructed from the diaries are presented in relation to distinct aspects of the co-production journey, alongside illustrative quotes. These aspects include: motivations for starting the project; making sense of the project; defining roles and responsibilities; challenges; and reflections on acquired knowledge and skills. From these insights, the researchers present recommendations for others endeavouring to engage in co-produced research. These include: recognising vulnerabilities and challenges during the early stages of a project; creating safe spaces; seeing the value of diversity; harnessing individual strengths; establishing a strong routine; and ensuring equal voice.

conclusionsThis paper presents a novel perspective on the realities of co-produced research by documenting the lived experiences of researchers within the context of foster care research. It highlights the importance of both measurable, tangible project outcomes, and the personal and skills growth of team members. The consistent use of diaries is encouraged as a valuable practice to capture learning, progress and achievements throughout the co-production process.

Indexed as

Children’s social careCo-productionDiariesEthnicityFoster careKinship careParticipatory researchPatient and public involvementReflectionUnderserved

Identifiers

PMID39402631
PMCPMC11475932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.