Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402625›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2024

A validated heart-specific model for splice-disrupting variants in childhood heart disease.

Robert Lesurf, Jeroen Breckpot, Jade Bouwmeester, Nour Hanafi, Anjali Jain, Yijing Liang, Tanya Papaz, Jane Lougheed, Tapas Mondal, Mahmoud Alsalehi and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Estimating protein isoform abundances with [Formula: see text].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current and future diagnostics of congenital heart disease (CHD).Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Robert LesurfGenetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jeroen BreckpotCenter for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jade BouwmeesterGenetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nour HanafiThe Centre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anjali JainThe Centre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yijing LiangThe Centre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tanya PapazGenetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jane LougheedDivision of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Tapas MondalDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mahmoud AlsalehiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Luis Altamirano-DiazDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Erwin OechslinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Enrique AudainInstitute of Medical Genetics, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Gregor DombrowskyInstitute of Medical Genetics, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Alex V PostmaDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Odilia I WoudstraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Berto J BoumaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc-Phillip HitzInstitute of Medical Genetics, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Connie R BezzinaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gillian M BlueHeart Centre for Children, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David S WinlawHeart Center, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago and Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Seema MitalGenetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. seema.mital@sickkids.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7643-4484

Funding

CardioVasculair Onderzoek Nederland (CVON) 2014-18 CONCOR-genesCIHR ENP 161429National Heart Foundation of Australia NSW CVRN Career AdvancementWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly. Almost 90% of isolated cases have an unexplained genetic etiology after clinical testing. Non-canonical splice variants that disrupt mRNA splicing through the loss or creation of exon boundaries are not routinely captured and/or evaluated by standard clinical genetic tests. Recent computational algorithms such as SpliceAI have shown an ability to predict such variants, but are not specific to cardiac-expressed genes and transcriptional isoforms.

methodsWe used genome sequencing (GS) (n = 1101 CHD probands) and myocardial RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) (n = 154 CHD and n = 43 cardiomyopathy probands) to identify and validate splice disrupting variants, and to develop a heart-specific model for canonical and non-canonical splice variants that can be applied to patients with CHD and cardiomyopathy. Two thousand five hundred seventy GS samples from the Medical Genome Reference Bank were analyzed as healthy controls.

resultsOf 8583 rare DNA splice-disrupting variants initially identified using SpliceAI, 100 were associated with altered splice junctions in the corresponding patient myocardium affecting 95 genes. Using strength of myocardial gene expression and genome-wide DNA variant features that were confirmed to affect splicing in myocardial RNA, we trained a machine learning model for predicting cardiac-specific splice-disrupting variants (AUC 0.86 on internal validation). In a validation set of 48 CHD probands, the cardiac-specific model outperformed a SpliceAI model alone (AUC 0.94 vs 0.67 respectively). Application of this model to an additional 947 CHD probands with only GS data identified 1% patients with canonical and 11% patients with non-canonical splice-disrupting variants in CHD genes. Forty-nine percent of predicted splice-disrupting variants were intronic and > 10 bp from existing splice junctions. The burden of high-confidence splice-disrupting variants in CHD genes was 1.28-fold higher in CHD cases compared with healthy controls.

conclusionsA new cardiac-specific in silico model was developed using complementary GS and RNA-Seq data that improved genetic yield by identifying a significant burden of non-canonical splice variants associated with CHD that would not be detectable through panel or exome sequencing.

Indexed as

RNA SplicingAlternative SplicingChildFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMaleMyocardiumCongenital Heart DiseaseGenomicsMachine LearningNon-canonicalRNA splicing

Identifiers

PMID39402625
PMCPMC11476204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.