Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402551›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Persistent deficits in knee joint kinematics and kinetics during gait following tibial plateau fractures - a longitudinal study.

Anna Fändriks, Roland Zügner, Jón Karlsson, Michael Möller, Roy Tranberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna FändriksDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-431 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. anna.fandriks@gu.se.
Roland ZügnerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-431 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jón KarlssonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-431 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Michael MöllerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-431 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Roy TranbergDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-431 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recovery process after tibial plateau fractures varies, with some patients experiencing persistent gait asymmetries for a long period of time. The aim of this study is to analyse knee joint kinematics and kinetics post-fracture using a linear mixed-effects model, assessing 26 participants over 24 months (aged 45, range 26-63), and an age-matched control group (aged 47, range 26-62). Participants underwent three-dimensional gait analysis at 6-, 12- and 24-months post-injury. Controls participated in the gait analysis on one occasion. Six gait variables related to knee joint kinematics and kinetics were analysed with a linear mixed-effects model. The model was constructed to determine if there was a differential improvement over time between the injured and the non-injured legs across the six variables, referred to as an interaction effect. If no interaction effect was observed, the model assessed whether there was a side difference between the legs and if there was any improvement over time in both legs. Additionally, non-parametric tests were performed to assess differences between the non-injured leg and the control group across the six variables 24 months after injury. The findings revealed an interaction effect in terms of cumulative absorbed power (p = 0.02, side difference p = 0.06). Other variables showed no interaction effects. Although a side difference between legs was observed for all variables (p < 0.001), only the variables regarding generated power exhibited improvements over time (p = 0.02 respectively). Minimal knee flexion, range of motion, and maximal extending knee joint moment showed no improvements over time. At the 24-month follow-up, the maximal extending knee joint moment was the only variable that differed between the non-injured leg and controls, with increased moment observed for the non-injured leg compared with the controls (p = 0.03). Taken together, two years post-fracture, patients demonstrated pronounced side differences between the injured and non-injured legs with worse ability to extend the knee joint and to generate power in the injured leg. While the kinetic variables improved over time, there were no improvements observed in kinematic variables. Moreover, the non-injured leg performed similarly to healthy controls in terms of minimal knee flexion, range of motion, and generated and absorbed power.

Indexed as

GaitKnee JointTibial FracturesAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesFemaleGait AnalysisHumansKineticsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionTibial Plateau FracturesGait analysisKinematicsKineticsKnee jointTibial plateau fracture

Identifiers

PMID39402551
PMCPMC11472471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.