Trial reportCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2025
Cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation using a Macintosh-style blade with and without the anterior piece of a cervical collar: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparison of McGrath MAC, AIRWAY SCOPEBMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Airway management in trauma patients: A seven-year review of emergency department intubations.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeApplying a cervical collar during videolaryngoscopic intubation can increase the lifting force required to achieve adequate glottic view, potentially increasing cervical spine motion. We aimed to compared cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation between applying only the posterior piece (posterior-only group) and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces (anterior-posterior group) in patients wearing a cervical collar.
methodsWe conducted a dingle-centre, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in 102 patients (each group, N = 51). We used a videolaryngoscope (AceScope™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) with a Macintosh-style blade (AceBlade™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for videolaryngoscopic intubation. In each group (posterior-only vs anterior-posterior), we measured cervical spine motion during intubation, defined as change in cervical spine angle (calculated as cervical spine angle at intubation minus that before intubation) at three cervical spine segments on lateral cervical spine radiographs.
resultsThe differences in mean cervical spine motion during intubation between the posterior-only and anterior-posterior groups were 1.2° (98.3% confidence interval [CI], -0.7 to 3.0), 1.0° (98.3% CI, -0.6 to 2.6), and -0.3° (98.3% CI, -2.2 to 1.7) at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) cervical spine angles at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments in the posterior-only vs anterior-posterior groups were 10.8° (4.2) vs 9.6° (3.3) (P = 0.13), 5.6° (3.0) vs 4.7° (3.5) (P = 0.14), and 1.2° (3.7) vs 1.5° (4.3) (P = 0.74), respectively. Intubation times were shorter in the posterior-only group (median [interquartile range], 23 [19-28] sec vs 33 [20-47] sec; P = 0.003).
conclusionsIn patients wearing a cervical collar, the differences in mean cervical spine motions during intubation between applying only the posterior piece and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces were approximately 1°. Intubation times were significantly shorter without the anterior piece of a cervical collar. These findings can be referred to when removal of the anterior piece of a cervical collar is considered to address difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation conditions. STUDY REGISTRATION: CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008151 ); first submitted 17 January 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.