ArticleScientific reports2024
Association of cardiovascular disease and urate levels with aortic aneurysm: a bilateral mendelian randomization study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the potential causal relationships between coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), urate levels, and aortic aneurysm (AA), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), thoracic aortic aneurysm(TAA), aortic dissection (AD) in individuals of European ancestry. To examine the potential causal relationships between CAD, MI, and urate levels with AA, AAA, TAA, AD, respectively, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Genetic instruments that reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10 - 8) for risk factors were obtained from genome-wide association studies(GWASs) conducted on individuals of European origin. On the other hand, genetic instruments of AA, AAA, TAA or AD were chosen from the FinnGen cohort. The primary analysis employed the inverse-variance weighted MR method, while sensitivity analyses were conducted using MR-Egger, weighted median MR, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, and Phenoscanner searching. In addition, we performed the MR-Egger intercept analysis to identify potential pleiotropy and utilized Cochran's Q statistics to evaluate heterogeneity. Additionally, we conducted bidirectional Mendelian randomization experiments to mitigate the potential influence of reverse causation. According to the results of our study, there were statistically significant higher risks for AA in relation to CAD/MI(odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.309 (1.150-1.490), and 1.255 (1.147-1.373). Similarly, there were statistically significant higher risks for AAA in relation to CAD and MI (OR with 95% CI: 1.383 (1.189-1.609), and 1.352 (1.178-1.552). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the causative effects of CAD/MI, and AA /AAA, were robust. A positive causal link was observed between CAD/MI, and AA/AAA. Nevertheless, no causal link was found between CAD, MI, urate levels, and TAA .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.