ArticleMikrochimica acta2024
Highly sensitive time-resolved fluorescent microspheres lateral flow immunoassay for the quantitative detection of triadimefon and its metabolite residues in fruits and vegetables.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Fluorescent Rapid Test Sensing System for Influenza Virus.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A general one-step lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) for the quantitative detection of triadimefon (TDF) and triadimenol (TDN) in fruit and vegetable samples was developed using time-resolved fluorescence microspheres (TRFM) as labels. A specific anti-triadimefon monoclonal antibody (mAb) was conjugated with TRFM to fabricate LFIA test strips. A time-resolved fluorometer as an LFIA reader was applied to obtain quantitative results and assess risk ranges for the LFIA test strips. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the limits of detection (LODs) in buffer/cucumbers/tomatoes/oranges were 0.046 ng/mL, 0.135 µg/kg, 1.047 µg/kg, and 5.811 µg/kg, respectively, which are ca. 1000 times lower than that of colloidal gold-labeled strips. The recovery in cucumber/tomato/orange samples was 109.4-116.7%, 87.7-110.9%, and 88.0-111.9%, respectively, indicating that the test strips had good reliability. Coupled with the easily customizable pretreatment procedures for various samples, the LFIA results were obtained within 18 min without the need for professional personnel or complicated equipment. TRFM-LFIA for TDF and TDN also shows remarkable specificity and precision. The test strips were also low-cost, portable, and convenient to use. These results indicate the test strips could be utilized as a novel strategy for on-site detection of TDF and TDN, which has the potential to expand and detect other pesticide or insecticide residues in food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39402286What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.