Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Security primitives for memoryless IoT devices based on Physical Unclonable Functions and True Random Number Generators.

Krzysztof Gołofit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Krzysztof GołofitInstitute of Electronic Systems, Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665, Warsaw, Poland. krzysztof.golofit@pw.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article describes various security primitives for significantly resource-constrained devices, such as sensors or sensor networks, IoT devices, wearables, etc. - i.e., devices without programmable memory. It is dedicated to parts which cannot handle complex algorithms of modern secure cryptography, cannot be equipped with programmable memories, or their circuits or data in permanent memories can be easily reverse-engineered. Instead, all security techniques (e.g., identification, authentication, and encryption) are based on modern hardware cryptography, mainly: physical unclonable functions (PUFs) and true random number generators (TRNGs). The paper addresses numerous issues from untraceable identification to mutual authentication to one-time pad encryption. The communication security is considered to be a trade-off between the device's resources (processing ability, energy consumption, implementation size, response time), preparation complicity (initialization time, size of a server data storage) and the security capabilities and protection levels. Primitives can be included into the communication protocol based on particular needs and available hardware resources.

Identifiers

PMID39402278
PMCPMC11473958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.