ArticleUrolithiasis2024
Automatic kidney stone identification: an adaptive feature-weighted LSTM model based on urine and blood routine analysis.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment and validation of a risk scoring model for predicting the risk of bladder stones in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Risk of Urinary System Stone Recurrence Using Anthropometric Measurements and Lifestyle Behaviors in a Developed Artificial Intelligence Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automated OSAHS detection from ECG using temporal convolutional network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Improved Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections and Urinary Stone Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Enhancing treatment decision-making for low back pain: a novel framework integrating large language models with retrieval-augmented generation technology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney stones are the most common urinary system diseases, and early identification is of great significance. The purpose of this study was to use routine urine and blood detection indices to build a deep learning (DL) model to identify the presence of kidney stones in the early stage. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with kidney stones who were treated at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2020 to June 2023. A total of 1130 individuals presenting with kidney stones and 1230 healthy subjects were enrolled. The first blood and urine laboratory data of participants at our hospital were collected, and the data were divided into a training dataset (80%) and a verification dataset (20%). Additionally, a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based adaptive feature weighting model was trained for the early identification of kidney stones, and the results were compared with those of other models. The performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the subject working characteristic curve (AUC). The important predictive factors are determined by ranking the characteristic importance of the predictive factors. A total of 17 variables were screened; among the top 4 characteristics according to the weight coefficient in this model, urine WBC, urine occult blood, qualitative urinary protein, and microcyte percentage had high predictive value for kidney stones in patients. The accuracy of the kidney stone (KS-LSTM) learning model was 89.5%, and the AUC was 0.95. Compared with other models, it has better performance. The results show that the KS-LSTM model based on routine urine and blood tests can accurately identify the presence of kidney stones. And provide valuable assistance for clinicians to identify kidney stones in the early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39402276What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.