ArticleHerz2025
Predictive role of peak VO
Article in Herz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vigorous exertion, regular exercise training, and the risk of sudden cardiac death due to myocardial infarction in Swedish men.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- The additive effect of cardiopulmonary fitness and triglyceride-glucose index on the risk of metabolic syndrome.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness as a Determinant of Arterial Elasticity in Response to Exercise: Evidence from a Study of Young Athletes and Healthy Controls.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of VO
methodsBased on a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score, 333 patients with high cardiovascular risk were included in this retrospective analysis. The study endpoint was MACEs, comprising all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, and coronary revascularization. The study cohort was divided into two groups according to the frequency of MACE occurrence. Measurements of VO
resultsThe best predictive accuracy for 1‑year MACEs was determined to be a VO
conclusionAccording to the results of this pilot study, VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
39402240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.